Friday, September 1, 2017

Basic Smart Trackers Such as Fitbit on the Decline, Smartwatches on the Way Up

Smartwatches have been accused of being gimmicks, being a small device on your wrist which pings you with notifications and in some cases can also analyze your heart rate or movement. Don't forget the price tag: a "decent" smartwatch (in the sense of it having a heart rate monitor, good processor, AMOLED panel and so on) will set you back around $200. The Huawei Watch, long-touted the king of Android Wear devices, sat at a preposterous $350 at launch. With the feature set mentioned above, many would consider the early adopters of such a device crazy. The industry seemed doomed to fail from the start. Predictions of greatness for the platform seemed largely unfounded, with the "year of the smartwatch" never coming. Major manufacturers dropped out of the industry late last year.

However, quarter 2 of 2017 seems to be telling a different story. A report by IDC shows that smartwatches are on the rise, and what's more, basic trackers such as Garmin and Fitbit are on the decline. Smartwatches are climbing in market share.

"The transition towards more intelligent and feature-filled wearables is in full swing"

– Jitesh Ubrani, senior research analyst for IDC Mobile Device Trackers

With the upcoming Diesel, Michael Kors, Movado, Tommy Hilfiger, Swarovski smartwatches (and many others), there has been a huge increase in this industry from fashion companies. This is likely due to one of the main attractions to having a watch, which is the fashionable aspect. They are luxury commodities, and so the introduction of high-profile fashion brands can be enough to attract many to the industry. With exposure to the industry, this can correspond to the increased attention given to competitors. Xiaomi and Apple are currently leading the charge, with Fitbit and Garmin's market share declining and Fossil's spiking massively. The advertising from the larger companies illuminates the industry as a whole, and probably has led to this massive increased interest in the smartwatch industry. Hopefully, as the industry grows we should start to see more and more improvements to both the software and the hardware.


Source: IDC



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2gwbFZc
via IFTTT

Ryzen Performance In Smaller Builds: A Look at the GIGABYTE AB350N-Gaming Wifi

One of the things that I personally have been looking forward to as part of AMD's Ryzen release was the announcement of AM4 boards in a mini-ITX environment. It's been a while since we've had a top-of-the-line AMD mITX build and, after getting the missing piece while visiting Los Angeles for SIGGRAPH, it's time to see how that actually performs in an everyday environment. To help us with this, GIGABYTE sent along their new mITX motherboard for AM4 — the AB350N-Gaming Wifi. Since I needed to remove the ASUS Z170I Pro Gaming anyhow to free up the Intel Core i7-6700k for use in benchmarks, this offered the perfect chance to test it out. It also turned out to be the perfect timing to revisit an issue we found during the original review of Ryzen, an issue specific to GIGABYTE motherboards and Ubuntu.


One of the most frustrating issues about making changes in this particular case is the Silverstone TD-03 SLIM 120mm all-in-one cooler and fan. When trying to close the cover (pictured above) it's a delicate dance of getting the lid closed, making sure everything fit without getting unplugged, and turning it on. In the few times that I have opened this case it has rarely happened and even broke the USB 3.0 header on the ASUS motherboard. This time I was determined to do it right – I really have no desire to repeat this unless I'm going to take that closed loop out and replace it with a forced air solution, such as possibly one of the Wraith coolers from AMD.

The build configuration matches what was originally listed in the Ryzen review for the Intel Core i7-6700k system. Since I have had issues getting the Corsair memory to play nice with Ryzen, I decided to change it out and use the GeIL memory that we had used previously for the review. Since this is my daily use PC I also decided to leave the SM951 in place instead of changing out to an NVMe drive. But let's get to the motherboard.


GIGABYTE AB350N-Gaming Wifi Pictures and Layout

While I was disappointed to see only two fan headers here, the layout of the GIGABYTE motherboard was much more amicable to the layout of the Steelseries Fortress Z case it was going in. The ASUS motherboard had all of the SATA and USB ports located towards the RAM and, when closing the case, is how the USB 3.0 header was pushed back and broke a pin. In this case I was able to run the cables for power, SATA, front panel and USB 3.0 header all along the side of the case, making it much easier when I needed to close it. The motherboard also supports GIGABYTE's RGB Fusion with a 4 and 5 pin header. Since this is my daily use PC and the GeIL RAM had mysteriously burned up its LED lighting feature, I decided not to use these. The PC is often on at night and in this case, less is better.

In addition to the motherboard the contents of the box also included the typical I/O shield, manual, driver CDs, two SATA cables and a Gigabyte Gaming badge for the front of the case. Gigabyte's typical wifi antenna is also included and features a magnetic base to easily allow it to stay on a case such as this Fortress Z.

On the rear panel was a great array of USB ports – 2 2.0, 4 3.0 and 2 3.1. An optical output is not provided, but a 2 pin S/PDIF along with using the 5V output from the USB 2.0 header can easily provide this if desired. While not used, a PS/2 connector was nice to see here. Also nice are the choices of HDMI and DisplayPort, used in conjunction with one of AMD's newly released AM4 APUs with integrated graphics. Standard gigabit LAN and 802.11/ac (up to 433 Mbps) as well as Bluetooth 4.2 are all included. On the board itself was also a USB 3.0 header, 4 SATA Ports and a 4+4 pin power beyond the standard 24 pin connection.


On a mini-ITX build space is at a premium, and so just like the ASUS motherboard it is replacing GIGABYTE also locates the m.2 slot on the underbelly. This gave us an opportunity to remove the stock AM4 bracket and replace it with the AM4 kit that was ordered to fit the Silverstone Tundra TD03-SLIM. It was nice to see that the kit also included a small, thin gasket to ensure that the new underplate didn't make contact with the motherboard – other products had not done this and originally had issues booting due to this.

While we had the 1700X and 1800X to choose from as well, I ended up installing the Ryzen 1700 in this motherboard. While this particular 1700 was only able to achieve an overclock of 3.7 on all cores, it should fit nicely in here and will allow me to ramp up and still get much of the same performance that I want from the Ryzen 7 without going overboard. When the i7-6700k was in this case it was discovered that temperatures would very quickly ramp up and kept in the mid-70s under full load. With that in mind I also set a more aggressive fan profile to keep the fans going at 100% any time it went over 60 degrees Celsius.


Setup & Use

Although it took multiple times to get everything to stay plugged in, it was time to put it to work. After setting the more aggressive fan profile and letting it break in, the Ryzen 1700 was idling around the mid 30s. Under load it will still reach as high as the 80s in sustained load but the TD03-SLIM helps keep it cool and get back down to to normal temperatures. Since it's the middle of summer here in Okinawa, it was a great chance to also test how it would perform in warmer environments. With the air conditioner off and the room temperature in the high 90s, the CPU sits in the mid 40s Celsius; the VRM chips though like to sit in the 60s, a little warm for my taste.

As for functionality and performance, everything is working well. There is one small problem though, and it's not the fault of GIGABYTE – and actually not really a problem either way. When looking into CPU-Z it was discovered that the Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 8GB was running only 8 lanes of PCI-Express, not the fully supported 16. Since it was shown in the past that this makes little difference in gaming performance it's more a curiosity than anything. GIGABYTE's manual shows that m.2 in SATA or NVMe should not affect this either.

I never was able to narrow down the cause but, a week later, it went away. I'll explain more on that in a bit.

Revisiting Ubuntu on GIGABYTE AM4 Motherboards

As mentioned at the beginning we wanted to take this time to also confirm the current situation regarding GIGABYTE's AM4 motherboards and the issues that prevented it from running Ubuntu 17.04 without a custom kernel. We had seen before that the fix had been pushed but never saw a ISO release containing it. As part of this I went and grabbed the latest daily image of Ubuntu 17.10 and put it on a USB stick. Booted to the USB and for the joy of all Linux users, Ubuntu 17.10 installed and runs on the AB350N-Gaming Wifi without any issues or any devices missing. A quick test of this on the AORUS X370-GAMING 5 also confirmed that the fix should apply to all motherboards that were not working properly due to this specific issue. Much credit goes to the Linux community members, Gigabyte and the Canonical team for both promptly identifying and pushing a fix to their kernel to once and for all put this to bed.

Note: According to at least one user on GIGABYTE's user forums the 17.04 build still does not reflect this, although the current 4.11 mainline kernel does include this support.


Conclusion

We're happy to see GIGABYTE boards working properly in Linux now. In our original testing of Ryzen the X370-GAMING 5 was one of our best performers in regards to overclocking ability. With the AB350N-Gaming Wifi we were able to take those same results from the review, plug them into the BIOS and were off to the races with all cores running at 3.7 GHz along with the RAM at its full rated speed of 3200 MHz. The wifi speeds are not the highest out there but it's also not the shabbiest. Features included on the board offer a wide array of options for building a good mini ITX PC, whether that be for a living room/HTPC, gaming, development or as a headless build box. I do wish that it would have included an optical out instead of the additional 3.5 mm jack but with a workaround in place it's not a deal-breaker.

Thanks to the changes in Ubuntu 17.10 we would have no problems in suggesting this motherboards for our readers. Given that there are only a few mini ITX options out there it's great to see an option out so quickly to support Ryzen and we look forward to the many new small form factor Ryzen PCs this will help make happen.


Update: One Week Later

For those of you who follow me on Twitter you may have realized that this build shut down on me on Saturday morning. It took most of the afternoon to figure out what happened, but the SilverStone TD03-SLIM all-in-one cooler wasn't functioning properly. Thankfully its only victim was the Ryzen 7 1700, which will no longer even POST when inserted into any motherboard. In as its replacement are now the Ryzen 7 1700X and the AMD Wraith Spire cooler.

After switching out the CPU and cooler many problems disappeared. The graphics card was once again utilizing all 16 PCI-Express lanes and the temperatures, despite being on a forced air cooler and heatsink, dropped to the mid 30s idling and high 60s under a stress load. It is regrettable that we lost a CPU in the process but glad to know that this is the reason why it was getting too hot in the Fortress Z case. And with the loop out of the way working in the case has become tremendously easier. It was a good test with the water cooling, but I think in this particular case the test is permanently over.

Intel Core i7-6700K Platform (Before Modifications)

All parts in this platform were personal purchases.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Platform (Changed Hardware Only)


Does the findings of fitting a Ryzen 7 into a mini-ITX motherboard and case intrigue you? Or perhaps you thought this wasn't a good solution and would like to see something else? Sound off on this in the comments below, Facebook, Twitter or Google+!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2iPbCso
via IFTTT

PSA: The LG V30’s Main Camera Aperture May Not Actually be f/1.6 as Advertised

At IFA 2017 Berlin, LG took to the stage to unveil their latest smartphone — the new LG V30. With the latest SoC from Qualcomm and a slew of other impressive features, the LG V30 is to be LG's trump card for the rest of the year and until the LG G7 comes into the picture.

One of the highlights of the LG V30 is its rear camera setup. LG has chosen to go in once again with a standard lens and a wide angle lens, giving us a good choice between two different views for framing our shots. Of particular interest is the aperture value on the main shooter, as LG claims that the main camera boasts of an f-number of 1.6. This f/1.6 makes the LG V30 the widest aperture consumer smartphone in current times, beating close rivals like Samsung's f/1.7 on the Galaxy Note 8 and Galaxy S7. The wider aperture would allow the phone to let in more light or decrease the shutter time. This should put the V30 one step ahead of its rivals on paper, giving it one more point that it can advertise for its superiority.

However, LG's claims for the main camera's f-number may not be as advertised. Early camera samples from the main rear camera indicate that the f-number on the rear shooter is actually f/1.69 instead of f/1.6. This was first pointed out by Russian blog Technot, which inspected the exif data from camera samples posted on a few notable Android sites. The exif data on the samples from Phandroid and GSMArena indicate that LG misled customers by mentioning that the V30 has an aperture of f/1.6. Other users on Reddit also confirm that the LG V30 indeed has a f/1.69 aperture.

Here is the complete EXIF data from one of GSMArena's sample pics:

EXIF Data

LG V30 EXIF data

  General  -------  Byte order:Motorola (big endian)    Main IFD  --------  Camera make:LG Electronics  Camera model:LG-US998  Software:  Date/time:30-08-2017 06:56:43 PM  Image description:  Copyright:  Orientation:Normal  Title:  Subject:  Author:  Comments:  Keywords:  Resolution:72 x 72 inches    Exif sub-IFD  ------------  Exif version:2.20  Brightness value:0  Colour space:RGB  Date/time original:30-08-2017 06:56:43 PM  Date/time digitised:30-08-2017 06:56:43 PM  Digital zoom ratio:1  Exif image width:4656  Exif image height:3492  Exposure programme:Undefined  Exposure time:0.00833333333333333 seconds  Exposure bias value:0  File source:  Flash present:Yes  Flash mode:Compulsory suppression  Flash fired:No  Flash red eye reduction:No  Flash strobe light:No detection function  F number:1.69  Focal length:4.03  Focal length in 35mm film:0  Gain control:  Image unique ID:  ISO speed rating(s):50  Light source:  MakerNote data offset:0  Metering mode:Centre weighted average  Related sound file:  Rendering:  Scene capture type:Standard  Scene type:Directly photographed  Sensing method:One chip  Shutter speed:8.338 milliseconds  Spectral sensitivity:  Subject distance range:  White balance mode:Auto    Interoperability sub-IFD  ------------------------  Interoperability type:R98  Interoperability version:1.00    GPS sub-IFD  -----------  GPS version:  GPS date/time (UTC):30-12-1899 12:00:00 AM  GPS altitude:0 metres  GPS satellites:  GPS status:  GPS measure mode:  GPS map datum:  GPS differential:    Thumbnail IFD  -------------  Thumbnail orientation:Normal  Thumbnail resolution:72 x 72 inches  

The V30's f/1.69 aperture should ordinarily get rounded to f/1.7 for brevity. Instead, LG chose to ignore the hundredths digit entirely, truncating the number to f/1.6 in its own favor. The end result is a number that indicates that the V30 does indeed have an even wider aperture for a smartphone camera.

LG's advertising and marketing machinery does heavily bank upon this misleading claim. The official press release for the V30 does tout it as the first f/1.6 aperture camera lens and goes on to boast the f-number in several places.

The change from f/1.6 to f/1.69 may not seem like a big deal – it's only a difference of 0.09! Right? Not quite — when you put into context that the closest competition to the LG V30 can only manage f/1.7 aperture, then LG's claims start venturing into the territory of misleading advertisement. The previous LG flagship, the LG G6, sported an aperture of f/1.8, so LG V30's claimed f/1.6 aperture would indicate double the numeric improvement over the previous flagship. Having the aperture actually be f/1.7 would take away talking points from LG's latest flagship, dulling its edge against the competition and rendering much of this marketing misleading.

LG can be given the benefit of doubt in this case because of how EXIF data works. EXIF data can often be unreliable, especially when the software could be buggy. The samples originate from review units, with at least GSMArena mentioning that the phone is an early pre-production unit. This incorrect f-number situation could be a result of early camera firmware writing incorrect data (it's arbitrarily set, so it could be a mistake), or it could be a case of LG trying to mislead customers.

We hope LG clarifies the situation with the V30's main camera and corrects the misinformation regarding its aperture value.


Source: Technot



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2wtqccf
via IFTTT

Huawei Shares Details of the Upcoming Kirin 970 SoC

About this time of the year we're used to hearing something from Huawei about a new Kirin SoC they've been working on. We were impressed with how well the Kirin 960 performed last year and compared it to multiple chipsets that were available at that time. Huawei is hoping to build upon that momentum this year with the upcoming Kirin 970. This time though, the company is marketing the addition of dedicated neural network silicon inside the chip.

It makes sense that Huawei would want to focus on this too. Google has doubled down on their machine learning technology and we're seeing competitors building similar features in their chips. There are benefits to having this technology in the cloud as well as on the device as it will give developers more options for how they implement their product. Huawei is calling their technology a Neural Processing Unit (also referred to as an NPU), and its performance is said to be rated at 1.92 TFLOPs of FP16.

Internal tests show this performance capability allows the Kirin 970 to process 2005 images per minute, which is up from 97 images per minute without the NPU. The new chipset from Huawei is similar to the previous Kirin 960 but sporting higher frequencies, being an eight-core SoC with four being Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz and the other four being Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.80 GHz. The GPU Huawei has chosen to go with is the newer ARM Mali-G72MP12, but the company has yet to announce its clock speed.

They did, however, confirm it will have a dual ISP, but again, didn't go into detail about its performance. It will be equipped with the Kirin 970 Integrated LTE modem (a Category 18 modem) with download capabilities of 1.2Gbps. The last bit of information that was announced at IFA this year was that it would be built on a 10nm process from TSMC. The company normally has big press events for their new chips, and since that wasn't the case at IFA, it is likely why they didn't reveal any more details about it.

Adding to the scarcity of information, the only models shown were generic models hooked up to development boards. We'll just have to wait until Huawei is ready to know the full specs of the Kirin 970 SoC and which devices it'll be featured in.


Source: AnandTech (Give them a visit for more info & coverage!)



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2gvTnHH
via IFTTT

Petition Asks the Developers of Phoenix OS to Open Source the Kernel

Android is mainly considered an open source mobile operating system, but there are a number of closed source elements that hundreds of millions of people use every day. The actual requirements of Android is that the kernel be open sourced for the public. This is enforced by the GPL but sadly this is one of those gray areas where someone actually needs to take legal action to enforce it. Some companies have violated this time and time again, and a new petition is calling for the developers of Phoenix OS to do the right thing.

For those who are unaware, Phoenix OS is one of the only full desktop versions of Android that is still being maintained. We've covered another popular platform, RemixOS, on a number of occasions but even they dropped out recently to focus on being a 2B2 company. This has left a lot of people to look towards Phoenix OS as their desktop Android solution, but there's one glaring flaw here. The developers have yet to release the source code for the kernel that's being used.

So while this operating system does offer a lot of unique features, hardware support is still poor and could benefit with help from the community. Not only would opening up the source code of the kernel fulfil the developers' legal and moral obligation, but it would also encourage a boost in community developer support. We here at XDA know the benefits of this and it's the only reason why so many aging smartphones and tablets can run the latest version of Android.

So a dedicated fan of the platform, Karol Putra, has created a Change.org petition in hopes that it will change their minds. We realize that many people scoff at the idea of signing an online petition, but it's one of those things that won't hurt the cause, and it could actually benefit it if the developers see there is enough interest from the community.


Source: Change.org



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2wXYurb
via IFTTT

ARCore for All Brings Google’s New Augmented Reality Platform to Unsupported Devices

Google recently announced a new platform called ARCore that enables smartphones without specific cameras and sensors to have fun with augmented reality. Much like Google has hardware requirements for its Daydream platform though, there are some hardware requirements in place for their augmented reality platform as well. However a community developer has figured out a way to get this working on unsupported devices with a new project they're calling ARCore for All.

We saw the same work done when Google launched Daydream since it required a certain level of hardware to pass the company's certification tests. Fellow XDA writer Adam Conway even wrote up a detailed step by step guide to show you how to do this for yourself. The thing is, Google puts these limits in place for a reason and it's generally the same reason why OEMs limit other hardware capabilities for their device. Even if something like this works and performs acceptably, there could have been other reasons it was limited (battery drain, heat generation, specific levels of performance, etc.).

Whatever the reason is though, some of us are willing to lose that tiny bit of performance, or use up more battery life than normal, just so we can try out the new feature for ourselves. This is where the ARCore for All project comes into play because it does exactly that for the enthusiast Android community. The developer was able to get this working thanks to this method on their G955F Galaxy S8+ and while it should work on others, your mileage may vary.

ARCore for All

So first up, you need to download and install the APK that is provided here. Since this requires the ARService from Google for it to work, you'll need to download and install that from here. However, if that ARService application doesn't install or run properly then you can grab this modified version. We tested this modified ARService application on the OnePlus 5 and it worked for us. Remember though, this is just an early preview of the ARCore program and there could be bugs, crashes, or performance issues while Google is ironing things out.


Source: GitHub



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2gp8kr9
via IFTTT

Swappa Opens Up a Gaming Section for Games, Consoles and Accessories

Swappa is XDA's recommended marketplace for selling and buying used smartphones. We feel it benefits the community more than using larger platforms (such as eBay) since you can save money in the process. There's an application in the Play Store that can detect the phone or tablet you're wanting to sell, or to just give you an alternative way to browse the selection of devices that are available. Recently, they have launched an entirely new category for those who are into gaming consoles.

Swappa started out as a place for people to just buy a sell smartphones. This expanded into tablets as the marketplace grew and then started to expand even further. Now, there are a number of categories including mobile, laptops, Macbooks, Chromebooks, watches, wearables, and VR headsets. You can tell there's an electronic gadget theme going on here so many wondered why video games weren't available. After some careful consideration, there is now a gaming section for current generation consoles including the PlayStation 4, Xbox One, Nintendo Switch and the Nintendo 3DS.

For those who are familiar with the process, it works exactly as you would expect it to. For those who are unfamiliar, you may want to check their Fees page as they detail the various tiers that was recently updated last year. Fees are paid by the buyer and are already included in the current list price of what you're seeing on the website or the application. So for example, devices that are sold which cost between $301 and $500 will have a $15 fee added to them, which is still lower than the $50 you would see on eBay and even lower than the $81 you would see from Glyde.

So Swappa now has a new gaming section that lists consoles, video games, and accessories. The listed consoles are pretty bare as of writing this, but they're slowly filling out as more people are becoming aware of the new category. There are already a number of video games and accessories listed though, so be sure to browse through them to see if there's a game you've been wanting to play through.


Source: Swappa



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2wXBqbW
via IFTTT