Thursday, June 1, 2017

Report: Samsung Galaxy S8’s Bixby Voice Won’t be Available Until Late June

Samsung's Galaxy S8 and S8+ are undoubtedly two of the hottest smartphones of 2017 with their gorgeous edge-to-edge display and top-of-the-line hardware without significantly widening the phone.

One of the most talked about features of the Galaxy S8 during Samsung's Unpacked event was its new virtual assistant called Bixby. Bixby is Samsung's take on the virtual assistant, offering functionalities similar to already popular virtual assistants like Google Assistant and Siri.

The full version of Bixby assistant was supposed to roll-out soon after both devices went on sale, but due to some technical issues, Samsung had to postpone the launch of Bixby Voice. At the time, Samsung said only Bixby Vision, Home, and Reminders would be available out of the box, with the promise to launch Bixby Voice in the U.S. in Spring. But according to a new report, it looks like we're still weeks away before Samsung finally rolls out the voice functionality of the Bixby assistant in the U.S.

According to sources familiar with the matter who spoke with The Wall Street Journal, the English version of Bixby Voice won't be available "until at least late June." According to the report, the reason for this delay is due to Bixby Voice struggling to understand English syntax and grammar, indicating the service is not quite yet ready for the official launch. So far Bixby Voice is only available in the South Korean language, with support for Chinese reportedly coming later this month.

Responding to the matter, a Samsung spokesperson told the WSJ :

"Bixby Voice benefits from time to further enhance natural language understanding and we are currently growing our user testing in the U.S. to prepare for launch."

Currently, pressing the Bixby button brings 'Hello Bixby' which shows you context-based information from apps installed on your device in Google Now-style cards. Fortunately, you can remap the dedicated Bixby button on your Galaxy S8 to Google Assistant if you don't care for Bixby.


Source: The Wall Street Journal



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2rYw6SZ
via IFTTT

Q&A with Android Execs Focuses on Project Treble, the Linux Kernel and More

Android's presence at Google I/O this year turned a lot of people's heads, but there really wasn't that much time dedicated to the largest mobile platform in the world. When a few members of the Android team sat down with All About Android, they said this was because a lot of the new changes are very technical. So the team didn't feel a lot of the changes really fit in a broader keynote speech. Still, there's a lot of work going on in Android O and a new Q&A with Ron Amadeo from Ars Technica touched on a few things.

When David Burke spoke about the changes in the Android O developer preview, he said they wanted to lay the foundation of how to improve Android over the next 5 to 10 years. This ended up having most of the upcoming changes fall into two categories: Project Treble and Vitals. Mr. Burke said setting things up for Project Treble took a lot of time and doing so required that the team to change a lot of the underlying code of the Android OS.

He said that the goal was to minimize the amount of work silicon vendors needed to put into getting a new update running on an existing phone, but admits that you'll still need some level of support from them due to bugs. Another topic of interest here was about the Linux kernel and how Android is still using a kernel (3.18) from 2014. Mr. Burke says they have version 4.4 working internally but that doesn't exactly mean they will ship it with the new update.

They are, however, working with the Linux community to extend LTS to be longer. Their goal is to make sure the LTS outlasts the multiple years of security updates that Google requires and right now things don't exactly line up. While these are some highlights, the rest of the Q&A talks about the new Vitals changes, Android Extensions, high-quality Bluetooth, and is definitely worth a read for a more technical discussion of changes coming in Android O.

Source: Ars Technica



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2ruaixK
via IFTTT

Unlock the Bootloader of the European LG G6 (H870)

LG Electronics has officially announced that the LG G6 can now be officially unlocked through LG's developer unlock program. The program works on the European version with model name H870.

The ability to unlock a bootloader is a big thing for all XDA enthusiasts. This move opens many new ways to customize the device, and XDA Recognized Developer and Contributor autoprime posted a detailed guide in which all the steps are explained. Please note that this method works only on the European version of the model. Follow the guide and enjoy your unlocked LG G6!


Unlock your LG G6 H870



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2ruo4jR
via IFTTT

LineageOS Changelog#10: Sensitive Numbers, Small Fixes And CVE Tracker

Every two weeks, the LineageOS team releases a short summary of the included changes. The biweekly review highlights the most important fixes and plans for one of the most popular custom ROMs around.

The LineageOS team has announced that some sensitive numbers will no longer be written in the call logs. This move should help the victims of various abuses and violence, for example. It also follows the EU decision to allow hotlines dealing with domestic violence or similar situations to be called with confidence. The list of sensitive numbers is available on GitHub, and everyone who wants to help by adding new numbers can submit the changes through Gerrit.

Two weeks ago the team announced that Jelly will replace Gello as a default browser. The app has been enhanced with the new desktop mode, similar to the one from Google Chrome. Rendering and incognito mode problems have also been resolved. Moreover, the Setup Wizard, AudioFX and lockscreen received small stability updates. Finally, a potential memory leak is also patched up.

Every month Google releases a set of security patches which fix a number of CVEs (security vulnerabilities). These changes often target the low-level of Android, specifically the kernel. To keep the device secure, maintainers need to add those patches to kernels. LineageOS has its own CVE tracker that shows the status of the updates, and developers are advised to patch their kernels against security vulnerabilities. The tracker does not scan the repository and developers need to mark particular CVEs patches manually.

Finally, there are some build roster changes. Google Nexus 4 is now re-added to supported devices. Additionally, these devices will receive the nightlies.

If you own one of the supported devices, you should consider giving LineageOS a try. Visit an official website or your device home forum for more information.


Source: LineageOS CVE Tracker

 



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2srSTmz
via IFTTT

Substratum Theme for the Nexus 6P Lets You Move the Status Bar Clock

Some custom ROMs let the user customize where the clock in the status bar is, but not everyone wants to install a custom ROM for features like this. So XDA Recognized Contributor AL_IRAQI came up with a Substratum theme that does this for you on the Nexus 6P. Once installed (just like a regular Substratum theme is), you can choose to move the clock to the middle or the left of the status bar. Check it out by following the link below!

Check out this Substratum theme in our Nexus 6P forum



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2qF7Vcd
via IFTTT

The Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence Introductory Bundle is Only $39

Valued At Current Price Discount

$480

$39

91%

  • Deep Learning Prerequisites: Linear Regression in Python
  • Deep Learning Prerequisites: Logistic Regression in Python
  • Data Science: Deep Learning in Python
  • Data Science: Practical Deep Learning in Theano & TensorFlow

Learn to Build the Kinds of Artificial Neural Networks That Make Google Seem to Know Everything

Build & Understand Neural Networks Using Two of the Most Popular Deep Learning Techniques

Get this deal!

Purchases made through XDA Depot benefit XDA. Our sponsors help us pay for the many costs associated with running XDA, including server costs, full time developers, news writers, and much more. While you might see sponsored content (which will always be labeled as such) alongside Portal content, the Portal team is in no way responsible for these posts. Sponsored content, advertising and XDA Depot are managed by a separate team entirely. XDA will never compromise its journalistic integrity by accepting money to write favorably about a company, or alter our opinions or views in any way. Our opinion cannot be bought.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2rIv0L5
via IFTTT

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Would We Care About the Essential Phone if it Wasn’t for Andy Rubin?

After months of alluding to what's coming next and an essentially leak-proof operation, Andy Rubin has finally announced what his new company "Essential" is simply calling the Essential Phone, or the PH-1. It has been hard to miss the hype surrounding its announcement day, since virtually every media outlet has been covering this device, including XDA, giving nearly as much headline space for the name of Andy Rubin as they do the name of the device.

Ocean Depths

In the early leaks of what many expected to be a mainstream flagship device, we already had good indications that the phone would feature a premium build along with a nearly edge-to-edge display. Being that Andy Rubin, responsible for Android's inception (and the reason most of us are here at XDA), was bringing this device to market we also expected a fairly unadulterated version of the OS, making the entire package fairly compelling. Unfortunately though, what we got was pretty much what should have been expected; an ultra premium device, matching price tag and "in-depth" coverage from all the media outlets that will pop-up on your parents' news feeds.

With a name like "Essential" and some outlets touting it as the "Anti-iPhone", what is it exactly that the PH-1 brings to the table that makes it so special, so essential? For starters, the phone isn't powered by an all-new in-house processor making what is in your pocket obsolete; it is powered by the same package that the Galaxy S8 and HTC U11 have, that being the Snapdragon 835 with 4GB of RAM. It also does not have some super special camera tech; it uses the same dual color and monochrome sensor setup that Huawei has been essentially using for over a year now, and that is increasingly being adopted by others too. It also has an extensibility function that is a more flexible version of what Moto has been doing with Moto mods, albeit so far it looks to be watered down in terms of offerings and support. Speaking of watered down, if you take your phone swimming with you, you will essentially kill it. The display is one of the stand-out features of the phone offering a not-quite edge to edge display that is more like the Mi Mix in execution than the Galaxy S8, except it has a huge notch in the top that in all actuality will in all likelihood break fullscreen applications on the phone, or force a large but unobtrusive and permanent status bar. Oh, the one thing that was not essential was the headphone port, for some reason.

For some reason, the Essential Phone is being dubbed the "anti-iPhone", and Andy Rubin is treated like a new Steve Jobs

If you have been following along, the Essential Phone is little more than a grab bag of ideas borrowed from other OEMs', though with different implementations (for better or worse) . So what is there to be excited for that others can't match? For starters the Essential Phone offers a titanium injection body, which differs from other metal devices which are milled from a block; we will have to wait for people like Zach at JerryRigsEverything to find out if there is a trade-off in durability, but Andy Rubin's reasoning for the choice makes sense on the surface — it follows that Titanium allows the thin phone with a narrow edge-to-edge display to not bend like an aluminum build would. It is also being offered unlocked and available for nearly all networks, at least in the US in terms of CDMA and GSM support. Andy Rubin and his team also have a vision for the future that differs greatly from our present, and should Essential take off, we could see some real innovation in the market.

Essential not only needs to deliver an excellent phone, but also a convincing suite of modules to be successful

But those are things they hope for the brand's future, and today the Essential Phone is simply yet another rectangle with some major tradeoffs in usability and an outrageous price for such an unproven brand. And that is, I think, what we shouldn't ignore. Pretty flagships are a dime a dozen in today's market, premium phones with new materials pop-up every cycle, and the trend towards infinitesimal bezels permeates the industry as a whole. With no outstanding hardware features outside of the modular functionality, which is neither essential nor too affordable (though, by the looks of it, cheaper than Moto's), what's making the internet go crazy about this phone? You know it and have known it since the headlines of the original rumors: Andy Rubin's name. You'll be hard-pressed to find coverage on an news portal that doesn't put Andy Rubin's name in the title of Essential Phone articles (we are guilty, too). If the Essential Phone is dubbed the anti-iPhone, Andy Rubin is implicitly being treated like a new Steve Jobs, and the way he has been presenting the device online, on stage and on interviews, only adds to such optics.

Going back to the Essential Phone itself — it looks like a modest flagship with everything we'd expect, and so far we really can pinpoint any crucial flaws or compromises outside of the lack of a headphone jack and, perhaps, the front-camera design (though that's more subjective). Indeed, because of the very slim hands-on coverage, we can't tell if the device's day-to-day experience will live up to the hype, and because this is a new release, we have no track record to base (or ground) or expectations. It might have, for example, sub-par speakers (as some similarly-bezeless phones before it have had), or durability, or what have you. The core specification points are certainly there, but a pretty face and the promise of features not included in the box, with no actual reputation or brand history, is a tough sell in today's market.

Of course, we want to get some hands-on coverage before we take our assertions any further. And, to be honest, the device does look gorgeous, and we have no reason to believe that the software experience at least, will be anything short of stellar, given the philosophy giving birth to this device, plus its emphasis on basics and openness. Yet after all of this, I can't shake off the feeling this this is, at the moment and from everything we've seen so far, another beautiful flagship with small bezel that's taking on a lot of popular features, and asking for a high entry price. This isn't a rarity in today's market, which is (thankfully) full of stellar options, with most in 2017 sharing nearly identical underlying hardware. What is most certainly unfair is prematurely overhyping this release merely due to the name attached to the company. Android has been trying to build an "anti-iPhone" of its own for years — many companies have tried and fail, proven companies that dwarf Essential in track record and execution. Let's not get ahead of ourselves, and let's not treat it differently up until we see what it's truly capable of.


What do you think about the Essential Phone? Would you be as interested if it was offered by a no-name Chinese OEM, for example? Sound off in the comments!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2rkRpep
via IFTTT